As the war on food security nears, the European Union has waged a jihad on European farmers. It’s a holy war sanctified in the name of a carbon-neutral future. In it’s attempt to bottleneck European farmers, the EU has raised taxes and energy/ petrol prices across the continent. They have also promised to introduce synthetic meats. But they failed to account for European farmers standing up to the anti-human green deal.
Farmers are the last thing that stands between humanity and the push to shift humanity towards a synthetic meat system and if the parasitic eco fascists of the EU thought the transition would be easy, they will think again as farmers galvanized through Europe.
What are synthetic meats?
Since our emergence from Africa over 2,000,000 years ago, we have been eating meat, and human agriculture has existed for the past 12,000 years. Notwithstanding changes in human habitat—from hunter-gatherers in Neolithic times to 21st-century industrialized society—ethics aside, animal meat has been a core part of the human diet.
With the dawn of scientific progress that promises to reshape our ethical landscape, we sought to replace the organic with the artificial. The world of synthetic meat is already a multibillion-dollar industry as companies race to establish an ecosystem of artificial foods for mass human consumption.
Its genesis begins not in farms but in the laboratory. “In-vitro meat involves injecting muscle tissue from an animal into a cell culture, allowing cells to‘ grow’ outside the animal’s body.”
The idea has now attracted member states of the EU, who, in the face of an increased population and a hyper-obsessed net zero goal, are set on introducing synthetic meat into Europe. Austria, France, Italy, and Germany want to explore the possibility of legalising and producing synthetic meats. The German government just announced €41,000,000 of funding for creating organic meat alternatives.
The Danish mass meat Exodus
Denmark seeks to become the first country to enact the diabolical shift towards a plant-based food system. In its climate agreement for food and agriculture, the Scandinavian nation announced it had made an investment of €168,000,000 to create plant-based foods. Danish farmers will be incentivized by €78,000,000 in bonuses if they grow plant-based crops.
Danish health foundation Norvo Dirsk has just announced €2,500,000 in funding for a project aimed at producing synthetic meats and milk. In a statement, the foundation claimed:
“Creates both ethical and climate-related problems that require scientific solutions… Researchers will develop technologies that use nutrients from yeast and algae in combination with growth factors to replace foetal bovine serum. This will provide a less expensive and more climate-friendly culturing method that is also ethically sound.”
Saving the world comes at a human cost.
Paying the bounty of our environmental sin comes at a high price. But cutting off our noses despite our faces is more than just about self-flagellation; it’s about virtue, apparently. Since its emergence into public consciousness, we’ve never addressed where we are willing to stop when it comes to redressing ‘climate change’. Assuming it’s real for a second, when do pro-environmental measures become too much? Is there ever a limit to what should be done in the name of addressing climate change? So far, we’ve learned there’s no limit.
The farm-to-fork strategy of the European green deal
Signed in 2020, the European Green Deal was a policy initiative designed to force the European Union into becoming climate neutral by 2050. The European Commission’s states:
“We need to redesign our food systems, which today account for nearly one-third of global GHG emissions, consume large amounts of natural resources, result in biodiversity loss and negative health impacts (due to both under- and over-nutrition), and do not allow fair economic returns and livelihoods for all actors, in particular primary producers.”
What’s happening to European farmers?
Across Europe, tens of thousands of farmers have furiously protested against the EU. An army of Italian farmers and their tractors have descended on Rome, expressing discontent with the European green deal, cheap imports, and tax. In Greece, over 2,000 farmers descended on Thessaloniki to protest. They demanded government support after floods and protested against the rise in energy prices and the diesel tax arising from the European green deal.
In Germany, over 400 trucks created a blockade, withholding access to Frankfurt airport. In Paris, farmers blocked over eight parts of the city with hundreds of tractors, creating blocades, after the German government announced it would cut farming subsidies. Portuguese farmers created a blockade in protests, blocking three roads linking Portugal to Spain, as they protested over cheap imports and insufficient government assistance.
And so, that is how climate change madness has now waged a war on food security across Europe, and farmers are their first victims
There’s something disturbing about seeing thousands of farmers desperately protesting for their basic rights to survive. But let’s not forget that our survival is dependent on theirs, and this issue is a global one, not only a European one. And who has the right to dictate what we eat? Apparently the globalists do, and the heart of their agenda is not anti-emission or anti-climate change, it is anti-human.
Food fascism
The globalists have a stranglehold on the lifeblood of European agriculture. European policies to combat climate change will save the planet and endanger human life, and worse, this paradoxical predicament is one the European Union is happy with.
The farmers protesting across Europe are obviously right; this political move by the European governments is a reckless, extremist, self-righteous, and sinister measure to combat climate change and usher in food fascism. They want to redefine the human diet as we know it.
It’s an assault on the human agriculture industry, and it wages a war on food security.
What’s so dangerous about synthetic meats?
Maybe it was too ludacris a question to ask 50 years ago, but we need to ask it now: what’s more important, to save the environment or to strip away the most basic of human rights, to have an adequate standard of living for health and wellbeing, or introduce artificially created synthetic foods that will endanger the human species?
Even though the tide of popular opinion has already decided the ‘truth’ of climate change ,we must stop to think before we usher in this new age of ‘Eco Fascism, as Michael Zimmerman once described it.
Bowing to the gods of eco-fascism by consuming synthetic foods will come at a heavy price for human health. In 2023, the World Health Organisation and the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations produced an extensive report on’synthetic meats’. Their investigation identified over 53 health concerns regarding the production of synthetic meats. They included heavy metals, microplastics, nano plastics, allergens, additives, chemical contaminants, antibiotics, and priorins. The use of hormones from animal serum and non-human genesis is biologically active and has been linked to certain cancers. One thing remains untouched: while policy, technocracy, and Eco fascism may infringe on global food security and basic human rights, we still have a choice; they cannot force feed humanity. As the late Viktor Frankl insisted, ‘the last of human freedoms is to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances—to choose one’s way.’
