How much truth can we really handle when it comes to UFO disclosure? In light of Intelligence officer, David Grusch recent testimony regarding UFO’s before the U.S congress, the disclosure community is aggressively pushing the government to reveal the truth. But what if the truth about aliens and UFO’s was more damaging than the muddied waters we swim in now?
Blink 182’s Tom De Longe and retired doctor Steven Greer have actively campaigned for ‘full disclosure’. In 1993, Steven Greer founded the Disclosure Project, which called for governments to disclose information on UFOs, extraterrestrial intelligent life, and advanced propulsion systems. In 2017, De Longe founded the ‘To the Stars Academy’ in an effort to lobby for full public disclosure of UFOs.
It sounds like a good idea, but there are problems.
The scenario reminds me of Aesop’s fables, ‘Be careful what you wish for’, lest it come true.’ Do we really know what we are asking when we demand full disclosure? It’s a question we have overlooked in our rush to demand government accountability.
In a podcast with Julian Dorey, the former head of the UK’s UFO desk, Nick Pope, raised some very pertinent questions about UFOs. Pope remarked, “What if part of the story is they made us? And what if there’s a secret too terrible to be told? What if we are being farmed (by aliens)? People say we’re ready for disclosure; people who say we’re ready for disclosure don’t know what that disclosure involves.” Pope is onto something.
Maybe there’s something about ‘full disclosure’ that may shake us to the core.
What if the truth is, as wild as it sounds, we are being farmed by aliens for our ‘souls’? What if the aliens are feeding off our negative psychic energy?
It sounds crazy, but it’s a possibility. We’ve recently witnessed live congressional testimony about the alleged existence of aliens and UFOs from other worlds in 2023. Before a bewildered House oversight and Accountability Committee in the U.S. Congress in 2023, intelligence officer Nick Grusch testified that he was investigating the existence of a ‘secret UFO retrieval program’. In a jaw-dropping moment, when asked by Senator Mace, “Do you believe our government is in possession of UAP’s?” Grusch responded, “absolutely,” based on interviewing over forty witnesses over four years. Then,quite astoundingly, Grusch argued that “biologics were recovered” among some crashed’spacecraft’. When pressed by Senator Mace, ‘were they human or non-human, Grusch emphatically replied, ‘non-human’.
Soon, the public may learn more than ever about UFOs. In his testimony, Grusch mentioned his ‘ontological shock’ while encountering some of the information he uncovered.
In his testimony before the U.S. Congress at the same hearing, Commander David Fravor, a retired Navy pilot read out a statement about the Tic Tac incident. The footage stems back to 2004, when Fravor was posted to the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group. When he launched off the Nimiz, Fravor was redirected to ‘real world tasking’.
Fravor was told, “Objects had been observed for over two weeks coming down from over 80,000 feet, rapidly descending to 20,000 feet, hanging out for hours, and then going straight back up, we arrived at approximately 20,000 feet… All four of us saw a white tic-tac object. Moving very abruptly over the water, we proceeded around the circle. Then the object suddenly shifted its longitudinal aircraft and began to climb… It rapidly accelerated in front of us and disappeared. We returned to Nimiz. We mentioned it to one of my crew members, and they went out to get the ninety-second video. The incident was never investigated, it wasn’t until 2009, until Jay Stratton contacted me to investigate. Unbeknownst to all, he was part of the ATIP programme in the Pentagon, led by Lius Elizondo. I was contacted by Mr. Elizondo. A few weeks ago, I was made aware Elizondo left the pentagon in protest and joined forces with Tom Del Longe, Chris Mellon, Steve Justice, and others to form To the Stars Academy, an organisation that presses the issue with leading industry experts and government officials. It removed the stigma of UFOs, which is why we are here today.”
UFO interest is bleeding over into our culture. It began with the re-emergence of Bob Lazar, a figure who claimed he was employed as a scientist to reverse engineer ‘alien spacecraft’. Lazar’s claims, while compelling, are hard to verify. In 2020, filmmaker James Fox produced a documentary titled ‘Moment of Contact, in which he investigated the alleged UFO crash and human contact with live aliens in Varginha, Brazil, in 1996.
Things really started heating up when the Pentagon released the UAP footage in 2020. Sceptics may push back on Grusch’s testimony, but Fravor’s involves video evidence from a first-hand witness. It seems like more Americans are open to the existence of extraterrestrial intelligent life too. A recent Pew Research Centre poll found that 65% of Americans believe ‘there is intelligent life outside of earth’.
The Senate congressional committee is set for more hearings on UFOs in the future.
While the likes of Fravor, Grusch, and others understandably feel humanity needs disclosure, are we ready for ‘full disclosure’? If ‘disclosure’ was provided to the public and it was revealed that human beings were ‘created’ and ‘genetically engineered’ by aliens, as some have claimed, what impact would that have on human societies?
I can’t help but suspect that it would be shocking beyond comprehension. It may mean that aliens are our ‘creators’, what impact would that have on organised Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, and Judaism?
Furthermore, how would we cope with the ‘ontological shock’? Are we ready for something like this? If there’s one thing we know about human nature, it’s our propensity for panic and mass hysteria, and if we learn about our human origins, would we be ready and able to accept the ‘truth’?
Disclosure raises more questions than answers.
I wonder: is the lack of disclosure designed to ‘protect’ us? Is it secretive because of the impact it may have on us? If it is, what could be so devastating that it could justify holding back potentially the answer to the most important question ever asked: where do we come from?
While disclosure raises more questions than answers, one thing is for certain: the campaign for public disclosure is being spearheaded, but when and if the truth comes out, will people be ready and willing to hear it?
